I must admit that while I was
reading Lydia Maria Child’s Hobomok I
struggled to find interest in the narrative. A hundred and twenty pages into
the novel, and having read Carolyn Karcher’s introduction, I realized that
Mary’s interracial marriage to Hobomok would only take place out of Mary’s
desperation (Child 123,125, 133,135). However, after reading Brian W. Dippie’s
first three chapters of The Vanishing
American: White Attitudes and U.S. Indian Policy, I found more potential in
Hobomok. Dippie argues that during
the 1800s the idea of the “vanishing” Native American race became a widely
spread notion, which allowed “progressive” Anglo-Americans to reassert and to
construct and American identity. Dippie writes,
the ‘inoxerable destiny’ of the
Indians, like that of the wilderness with which they shared an almost symbiotic
relationship, was to recede before civilization’s advance. Their fate had
important implications for white Americans self-consciously searching for a
national identity. (15)
Here, Dippie explains that disseminating inaccurate notions
about the genocide of Native Americans, not only reinforced thoughts of more
“civilized” times, but also ideas of a growing white American identity. Also
that progress would become exclusively tied to the changing landscape, in which
Native Americans would have to disappear because of their perceived interdependent
relationship with the wilderness. The conception of a vanishing Native American
race as part of an inevitable “destiny” becomes salient in Hobomok’s departure.
After Charles Brown comes back from England and encounters Hobomok in the
forest, Hobomok leaves. In fact, he seems to vanish into the wilderness. The
narrator tells, “He paused on a neighboring hill, looked toward his wigwam…
with a bursting heart again murmured his farewell and blessing forever passed
away from New England” (Child 141). Thus, Hobomok appears to move deeper into
the forest and disappear. After reading Dippie’s text, this passage seemed much
more meaningful. It not only depicts Dippie’s point about the destined
desertion of Native Americans, but also Karcher’s claim about Child’s growth as
an advocate for equality.
In Hobomok, Child presents her early understanding of racial
co-existence and intermingling, which based on the ending of the novel is
destined to fail. Child’s Hobomok
demonstrates how constructions of identity and nation permeate a text, and work
to reassert such notions. For example, although the innovative part of this
text is the idea of a white puritan daughter running away into the wilderness to
marry a Native American, the narrative’s conclusion deems the idea of interracial
marriage as desperate and fatal. Also the erasure of a Native American identity
in Hobomok’s son (Child 150) works to reiterate the idea that power remains in
the hands of the imagined growing white population—which connects to Ezra F.
Tawil’s “Domestic Frontier Romance, or, How the Sentimental Heroine Became
White.” Therefore Hobomok becomes
interesting because of how it depicts the complexities of marking a change in
understanding racial relations in America, and also how writing allows an
author to develop new and more complex ideas about race. In Child’s case,
writer’s growth can be seen in her An Appeal For the Indians, which
although far from perfect—and still saturated by the kind of nostalgia unveiled
in Lora Romero’s “Vanishing Americans: Gender, Empire and New Historicism”—the
text, certainly demonstrates a much more politicized and conscious writer…but
we can talk about this in class. I am curious to hear what others thought.
Sara, I really appreciate how you focused on the ways in which Hobomok (the novel) constructs identity and nation. The national myth-building, especially, is intriguing to me, though I did not choose to write about it in my own post because I'm still grappling with it. Although Child's racial sympathies did grow, and as you point out, she was one of the first to start thinking about race in more nuanced ways, I felt that the novel in many ways valorized the white community despite its more nuanced engagement with Natives than in Cooper, for instance. I look forward to discussing this in class this evening.
ReplyDelete